Author: SME Chamber

During a public consultation seminar on the 15th June organized by MIEMA last week, president of Renewable Energy Section Noel Gauci made GRTU’s position clear that under no circumstance will GRTU tolerate that Malta invests in foreign countries to reach its renewable energy targets, if similar investments are possible locally. If any investment is to be done, then government should make it in Malta to create business and jobs for our own companies, not elsewhere. Even if it had to cost more to do it here, which is very unlikely, the advantages of employment and related benefits will greatly outdo the difference in cost. Moreover it is essential to have full control on such sensitive plants, something which cannot be guaranteed if it is done on foreign soil.

Noel Gauci also commented that while initiatives like the one taken by MIEMA are commendable, one should be cautious when reporting to the media. For example a recent article selected part of a MIEMA study and emphasized an issue that does not even exist, something which MIEMA officials agreed with.

The article referred to glare that could affect aircraft during landing. To date no pilots have complained on such issue, mostly because the PV systems installed in Malta are too small to make any significant impact of the pilots’ visual. Mr. Gauci suggested that MIEMA issues a statement to clarify their position.

Another topic raised was that we need to stop wasting our time proposing the impossible, such as installation of PV farms on virgin green spaces, of which the country has very little left. To the contrary we should focus on what is doable, such as installations in areas already scarred by heavy industry, the separate use of factory roof tops, installations out at sea, etc. Mr Gauci also noted that GRTU is continuously liaising with MRA and PPCD to ensure that before the end of the year a new domestic PV scheme is launched. Although GRTU had worked hard to see a scheme launched prior the trade fair, circumstances beyond everyone’s control made it impossible for such a scheme to materialize.

The Prime Minister replied to a letter sent by GRTU on the suspension of the ERDF Energy Grant Scheme. The PM said that he appreciates GRTU’s point about the cash flow of companies awaiting payment and that Government is committed to completing this process in the earliest time possible. He assured the GRTU that although payments cannot be approved and processed at this point, administrative processing of claims is continuing with a view to processing bona fide claims as soon as the enquiries are complete.

The GRTU National Executive Council has today convened and discussed amongst other subject the EU White Paper on Pensions. In his report the Director General Vincent Farrugia pointed out that:
As a result of low birth rates and rising life expectancy, the population is ageing. Projections on demographics should therefore be analysed and monitored on a regular basis to allow adequate and timely adjustments of the pension system to new conditions.

However, these projections, including future public expenditure on pensions, must be used and viewed with care, as they may include many assumptions hard to predict in the long term. Eurostat's assumption that life expectancy will increase by seven years in the EU over the next 40 years, although based on the best expert knowledge, cannot be certain. Further improvements in longevity can be influenced by changes in working and living conditions. It is doubtful that a mere rise in legal retirement age can solve the problems connected with demographic challenges.

On the contrary, this may push a substantial number of elderly people below the poverty line, particularly women. What is needed is to increase the effective retirement age up to the existing legal retirement age using initiatives to foster extended working life, flanked by effective growth and employment policies. Only a real "active ageing" policy, aimed at increased participation in training and lifelong learning, can sustainably boost employment rates for older people, who give up work early due to health problems, the intensity of work, early dismissals, and lack of opportunities for training or re entering the labour market. In addition, a rise in legal retirement age can increase pressure on other pillars of social security. Automatic adjustment mechanisms for retirement age, based either on longer life expectancy or demographic change, may be assessed as dangerous for society as a whole and therefore not supported.

Most of these mechanisms automatically increase retirement age in correlation with extended life expectancy and other economic or labour market parameters. Such fundamental decisions on living conditions should be taken by parliaments, not computers, after a broad public debate, including social partners and other important stakeholders. In addition it should also be taken into account the fact that although it reduces public pressure against reforms, in the absence of real job opportunities for older workers it could shift financial support for these workers to other social security pillars. Thus, implementing bluntly this mechanism into pension schemes to make pensions adequate and sustainable would fail to deliver the promised benefits. All pension schemes, regardless of financing method, can be affected both, but in different ways, by economic crises and by ageing.

Therefore, good management and supervision of these schemes and economic policy are necessary to reduce considerably the risks that threaten their sustainability. The Pay-As-You-Go mandatory schemes must continue to play a fundamental role in assuring future pensions and therefore special attention should be devoted to them in order to inverse the tendency of decreased replacement ratios. At a time of population ageing, success in ensuring sustainable public finances will depend on the efforts in the following key areas: supporting quantity and quality of employment, raising productivity and economic performance, improving flexicurity in the labour market, lifelong learning, immigration and the integration of migrants.

 A pension system must be credible and adequate, what implies searching for and implementing new financial resources in order to guarantee an inter-generational balance. Only then will future generations contribute to a pension system, a crucial condition for making pension schemes sustainable. Pension systems must be transparent, and information and statistics on their functioning as well as on all rights of the participants must be available and understandable. Training in financial literacy should become part of school curricula.

Pensions are not a "reward" but rather a form of deferred wage or saving, irrespective of the type of system. Pensioners are a very important socio-economic category and should not be seen as a burden but a key economic player comprising on average 25% of the population, who fuel demand. Adequacy and sustainability of pensions should be considered as a priority both from a macroeconomic and a social perspective. This is a vital issue for the economy, and so the competent authorities should consider looking for sources of funding or ways of complementing it, other than levies on salaries, to help financing the pension systems.

GRTU has worked in close collaboration with Richard Cachia Caruana throughout the years that he was in charge of the Secretariat of Eddie Fenech Adami’s PM’s office, and throughout the whole negotiation process prior to Malta’s accession to the European Union and over the last eight years as Malta’s formidable Ambassador and Permanent Representative to the European Union in Brussels.

The loss of Richard Cachia Caruana as Malta’s Representative in Brussels is great indeed. Malta has worked well with the EU and Malta’s relative excellent economic and social success story as EU member, when compared to other Mediterranean Member States, is to a large extent due to Richard Cachia Caruana’s performance and efficient representations. It is really a hard act to follow. A great loss for Malta.

Why did you become an entrepreneur?
Because I wanted to become one.
How have you come to choose your line of business?
By trial and error!

Where did you go on your last holiday? Jerez de la Frontera—Spain—the thing I liked most was their winery. What is your earliest memory? Playing in my grandma’s garden. If you could chose to be someone famous who would you be and why? I am happy as I am !

The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) concluded in its opinion of 30 January 2009 that the tolerable weekly intake of cadmium was no longer appropriate in view of the new developments related to the toxicology of cadmium. The EFSA established a new tolerable weekly intake of 2.5 μg/kg, resulting in a tolerable daily intake of 0.36 μg/kg. The tolerable amount of Cadmium present in toys was therefore amended by means of Directive 2012/7/EU so as to be within the limits considered to be safe and therefore ensure the safety of children when using products covered by the Toy Safety Directive (2009/48/EC).

The deadline for comments on the proposed draft is 9 July 2012.

Proposal

The entry for Cadmium in the table listing migration limits from toys or components of toys in point (15) of Part IV of Schedule I to the Safety of Toys Regulations, 2011 shall be replaced by the following values: 17 mg/kg for scrapped- off material, 1.3 mg/kg for dry material and 0.3 mg/kg for liquid material.

Background

Directive 2009/48/EC sets limit values for cadmium, based on the recommendations of the Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) made in the 2008 report entitled "Chemicals in Toys. A general methodology for assessment of chemical safety of toys with a focus on elements".

For cadmium, RIVM used the tolerable weekly intake of 7 μg/kg established by the Joint Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations and the World Health Organisation Experts committee on food additives (JEFCA) in 1989 and confirmed by JECFA in 2001. A safety factor of two was applied, resulting in a tolerable weekly intake of 3.5 μg/kg and a tolerable daily intake of 0.5 μg/kg. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) concluded in its opinion of 30 January 2009 that the tolerable weekly intake established by JEFCA in 1989 and confirmed by JECFA in 2001 was no longer appropriate in view of the new developments related to the toxicology of cadmium.

The EFSA established a new tolerable weekly intake of 2.5 μg/kg, resulting in a tolerable daily intake of 0.36 μg/kg. The tolerable amount of Cadmium present in toys needs therefore to be amended so as to be within the limits considered to be safe and therefore ensure the safety of children when using products covered by the Toy Safety Directive (2009/48/EC). Who would be interested Manufacturers, importers and distributors (sellers) of toys. What will be affected Toys falling within the scope of the Toy Safety Directive (2009/48/EC). Dates Feedback to be received by the 9th July 2012.

Contacts Comments to be sent to the Regulatory Affairs Directorate, Technical Regulations Division, Malta Competition and Consumer Affairs Authority by e-mail –

As part of its Internationalisation Calendar for 2012, Malta Enterprise is inviting interested parties to register their interest to participate in the SIAL Food Fair 2012.
The Event
In SIAL 2010, around 140,000 professional visitors from the food industry visited the SIAL Food Fair to meet 5,838 French and international exhibitors.

Exhibiting in SIAL 2012, will

• STRENGTHEN and DEVELOP your image and brand awareness with an exceptional number of highly-qualified visitors

• RETAIN your existing clients and RECRUIT new ones

• DEVELOP your turnove

r• BOOST your exports

• MEET potential business partners (distributors, agents)

• DISCOVER the trends in your sector

• BENEFIT from exceptional media coverageShould you exhibit, your company may be eligible for financial support from Malta Enterprise (after the event) of the eligible costs incurred for

:• Rental of exhibition space / stand

• Stand construction services,

• Freight expenses incurred for shipping materials / exhibits required to setup and run the stand.

 Travel and a €147 daily for the no. of days of the event for one representative per company Should you wish to book individually please contact the organizers directly on ().

  Further details on space costs and the different product halls can be obtained from the fair’s website (www.sialparis.com). If you wish to be located on the Malta Pavilion, kindly contact the Internationalisation Unit on tel: 25423294 or email : by end of June.   

Negotiations have been tough but there is a deal and an agreement – and that is a good thing! Overall, the EU civil society representatives from the EESC are pleased that the green economy has been included in the agreement as the main conduit to sustainable development and welcome the introduction of sustainable development goals and a range of provisions intended to strengthen international sustainable development governance.

The agreement that has been negotiated opens up new avenues for further development and will see improved sustainable development in a number of areas. However we regret that the agreement lacks ambitious and action- oriented decisions. The Rio+20 outcome document, agreed by negotiators and to be approved by world leaders meeting this week in Rio, acknowledges many of the world’s needs but does not reflect the urgency of the situation. While the outcome text recognises the role of businesses and civil society stakeholders, there are no new established mechanisms to ensure effective civil society participation in the transition process towards sustainable development.

“The road from Rio is as important as the road to Rio. From now on, we are in implementation mode. The EESC will continue to act on the Rio+20 follow-up within the EU and with its non-EU partners, in order to promote, facilitate and enable civil society input into policy- and decision-making processes so that we can really achieve the future we want,” said Staffan Nilsson, EESC president. We urge the EU and all other parties to involve the EESC and other social and economic councils and similar civil society structures in the Rio+20 follow-up that is designed to secure the transition towards a new green economic order.

As an EU advisory body, feeding into and supporting the EU’s input and position in the negotiations, we appreciate the EU negotiators’ efforts to push for ambitious targets and to secure a real deal, rather than a mere statement of intent, at the Rio+20 conference. However we ask the EU to stick to its internal commitments and to keep pressing home the argument in its dealings with its partners. For more information: EESC Rio+20 Online Platform The EESC messages to Rio+20 Video messages