Waste Packaging: Scheme Taking on members

Green MT

WEEE: Well ahead of competitor

Over three hundred members have already signed their letter of intent to join Green MT s Waste Packaging Compliance Scheme, once Eco Contribution exemption is granted by Government. In itself this is a tremendous achievement when considering that recruitment to the Scheme was launched just over a week ago.

This clearly shows that Maltese importers and traders, together with the manufacturing industry, have decided to make sure that they will take on their legal obligations by joining Green MT s National Compliance Scheme.

"Despite all the setbacks and misleading information given by other parties who should know better, many Waste Packaging producers out there have shown their commitment and support to this National Scheme. We have built an infrastructure to logistically make sure that this National Scheme will reach its obligations. We are assured by the authorities that they will let go of Eco Contribution in respect to WEEE products and Waste Packaging resulting from current Eco Contribution payers." states Green Mt CEO, Joe Attard.

Green MT limited was also issued a permit to run a WEEE Scheme in March 2008. Discussions with leading companies involved in the importation of Electrical and Electronic Equipment have been going on since early 2007 and the Scheme is now only awaiting Government to exempt its members from Eco Contribution for the logistical operation of this Scheme to move on. Exemption Procedure has still to be put in place.

Agreements with a number of stakeholders are already in place for this operation to be totally and holistically in place. Official information released by MEPA currently states that WEEE market placement registered to date stands at 7900 tons.

Green MT proudly announces that over 5500 tons are already registered with the Green MT WEEE Scheme and further more is even more pleased to announce that all those who have registered with MEPA as producers of CATEGORY 1, being Large Household Appliances, are all members of Green Mt Limited. 

Individual Category meetings are scheduled for early November 2008 (so please keep a look out for your Category Meeting on GRTU newString). All registered Scheme members will be also contacted directly.

 

In respect to Eco Contribution Exemption, both GRTU and Green MT have had continuous discussions with Government on this subject matter and we are proud to note that we have been working hand in hand with Government over the last months to make sure that LN 74 of 2008, issued in February 2008, is actually implemented accordingly.

In this respect two Legal Notices are currently at Draft stage and will soon be out for public consultation. These are:

The Waste Recovery Scheme Regulations 2008

Eco Contribution (Granting of Refunds and Approval of Waste Recovery Facilities) Regulations, 2008.

GRTU and Green MT were very instrumental in building the new holistic approach to Waste Management Strategy in respect to WEEE and Waste Packaging Compliance. Our logistical Schemes are not based on paper work exercises but on real time solutions aimed at providing a not for profit service to its members.

Continued discussions with Waste Serv have now effectively created a tendering mechanism for end result resource being sold from this facility. Where before Waste Serv used to pay for separated waste to be taken, now all fractions provide a positive contribution. We are proud to have made this happen together with the collaboration of the Ministry for Resources and Rural Affairs.

Without fail Green MT has also been working with Government to make sure that Waste Recovery Schemes operate on a fair and level playing field. This has been an exercise which will accordingly ensure that Compliance Schemes are not merely a paperwork exercise but are effectively doing what their permit obliges them to do.

There is still a lot to be done in Waste Management Strategy locally, this is only the beginning. Green MT Limited will abide to the concept of a fair and level playing field. In retrospect every other Scheme in the market would have to do the same.

In all our logistical build-up Green Mt has involved the Local Councils Association  and intends to continue to do so, both with further discussions and by providing fiscal incentives to these Local Councils in respect to the collection of Waste resource from their locality.

Green MT continues to take on members for both Schemes. Without fail the figures already show that both Schemes will be a National success story.

Today, we continue to insist with all Bona Fede traders to register their market placement both for WEEE and Waste Packaging with the Competent Authority. Green MT limited can help you do this, so those who have as yet not registered are truly a phone call away.

Green MT staff can be contacted by phone on 21 232881/3 or mobile 99041462.

Green MT's price list is available on www.grtu.org.mt.

 

 

 

Problems Faced by Family Owned Busines – 8th October 2008

Family Business Conference – Speech by Vince Farrugia, Director General

What is a Family Business?

Talking about family business may conjure up thoughts of small father and son firms but family enterprises form a backbone running right through the economy who are particularly prevalent in the micro business sector (firms with fewer than 10 employees) are also common in the rest of the small and medium enterprise (SME) sector.  Some of the very largest private companies are also family firms.

 Family firms vary significantly in size and differ in the degree of family involvement in the business.  Some families will take a role in the day-to-day running of the business, whilst others will take a more hands-off approach with the involvement of professional non-family managers.  Family firms range in terms of longevity from early-stage to long-standing multi-generational firms.

Precise definitions of a family business vary, but the firms should have to meet some criteria about their ownership or management.  A commonly accepted definition, as worded by "The Family Entrepreneurship Working Group" set up by the Finnish Ministry of Trade and Industry in 2004, is that:

  • The majority of control is held by the person who established or acquired the firm or their spouses, parents, child or child's direct heirs.
  • At least one representative of the family is involved in the management of administration of the firm.

 

In addition, and particularly to smaller firms, subjective criteria need to be employed in order to distinguish family firms from entrepreneurs in other owner-managed firms more generally.  Most obviously, the firm itself can be asked whether it considers itself to be a family business.

 

Characteristics of a Family Business

 

Ownership typology

 

The tightest control is in owner-managed firms, which are owned by a single person who is also the only managing director.  Sole-traders are therefore owner managed.  Bigger firms are more likely to be family-managed, where the ownership and management is in the hands of at least 2 family members.  In family-controlled firms, the family takes a more hands-off approach and the management and/or ownership is shared with non-family members.  The family remains in full control of the company, however, by holding a significant proportion of the voting rights.  The largest family firms will be family-controlled.

For small and medium-sized firms, around 40% are owner-managed, 45% family-managed and 15% family-controlled.

 

Sectoral concentration

Family firms are particularly prevalent in agriculture and construction and retail and services.  Within the services sector, family firms are most likely to be found in distribution, hospitality, catering and tourism.  They are under-represented in sectors such as finance, manufacturing, banking, telecommunications, insurance and business service.  This no doubt reflects the high start up costs involved in these sectors.

 

Generational Transfer

 

A sample survey by GRTU found that 77% of family firms in the SME sector are controlled by the first generation, 10% by the second generation and 6% by the first and second generation.  Only around a third of family firms tend to be passed onto the second generation and one tenth reach the third generation, the rest being either sold or closed down. 

 

Surveys elsewhere show that the bigger – and probably older- the firm, the more likely that it has already been passed onto future generations; family firms in the SME sector with at least 10 employees are twice as likely as those with fewer than 10 employees to be controlled by the second generation.  The generation of ownership also varies by sector, with agricultural businesses most likely to be controlled by the second generation.

 

Our survey of family firms suggests that most have no definitive plans abut what to do with the firm in the future, with 61% of owners saying they had made no decision about what would happen when they stepped down from the helm.  Of the remainder, 16% had already decided on a successor, 13% planned to sell the business, while 10% planned to close it down.  Last year our survey showed that 19% of respondents intended to sell or transfer the business in the future.

 

Executive Summary

 

We estimate that family firms account for 85% of the private sector enterprises in the economy. The vast majority of family enterprises are small and medium enterprises (SMEs).  56%are sole traders with no employees.  We also estimate there to be over half the firms with over 250 employees are also family owned.  These alone account for 20% of the turnover of the overall family business sector.

Because family enterprises are more likely to be small firms, they account for a lower share of turnover, employment and GDP than of the total number of firms in the economy – but the share is still substantial.  Family enterprises produce around 45% of turnover in the private sector.  We estimate that they also account for around 40% of GDP in the private sector and 38% of GDP in the overall economy.

 

Their share of employment is slightly higher, given that small firms tend to employ more people per unit of output than large firms.  We estimate that family businesses account for around 45% of private sector employment, providing employment to 60,000. The contribution of the family business sector to the economy extends beyond its direct contribution to output; it also acts as a crucial breeding ground for entrepreneurial talent and start-ups. Furthermore, we estimate that family businesses pay around 25% of the Government's total tax receipts.  If we include taxes paid by employees of family firms, this raises the contribution to tax revenues 35% of the total.

 

Meanwhile, there are good reasons for family firms to be more profitable and stable than other firms.  Perhaps the biggest advantage lies in aligning the interests of managers and owners.  Family firms also tend to have a longer time-horizon than other firms.

 

The business and tax environment has generally been supportive of family business.  However, further progress could be made in the development of a more favourable tax regime through extending the scope of business property relief and protection of business asset holdover relief.  Measures to improve the succession rate of family firms when it comes to passing the firm on from the current generation are also needed.

 

Some Statistics

 

  • Entrepreneurial activity is about 6 to 8%of the adult population
  • They usually establish businesses that are more than 50% family owned. About a third would be businesses that emerge from other family businesses
  • About 10% of the population own or manage a business
  • Family based start-ups use the amount of initial finance compared with non-family start-ups and are more likely to approach close family for their start-up finance than those who do not have a family base.
  • Levels of self and family ownership are significantly higher amongst established business owners than early stage start-up entrepreneurs. 67% are owners of more than 50% of their business.
  • The level of self and family ownership are significantly higher for women than for men, 75% compared to 60%.
  • Significantly more early stage entrepreneurial activity emerge from existing family businesses than for owner managed.

 

Finance: Sources

 

Close Family

57%

Other Relatives/Extended Family

38%

Work Colleagues

20%

Individual investors not previously known

2%

Bank

72%

Government Schemes

20%

And other sources

10%

 

217

 

Government programmes are used less by family firms and family businesses – do not feel government is interested in financing family businesses.

 

Advantages of Family Businesses

 

  • Family firms might be a positive force when it comes to performance of the private sector in terms of productivity and profitability. Research has shown that family owned businesses tend to perform better because they better align the interests of managers and owners and better incentivise managers to achieve the firm's goals. Managers tend not to pursue their own interests to the detriment of owners' interests as happens in non-family owned firms.
  • Family members working for the business will stay longer than staff of non-family firms and gain more firm-specific expertise and lower the productivity losses of high rates of staff turnover.
  • Family firms take corporate social responsibility more seriously. They tend to be small firms and build local relationships and good will with suppliers and customers.
  • Family firms tend to have a more flexible approach to management and use a centralized decision process to enable quicker decision-making.
  • Family firms tend to be more willing to wait longer than most other investors for a return on capital invested.
  • Family businesses are more prepared than other firms to continue investing during cyclical downturns giving them an advantage on other non-family firms who tend to follow cash flow more closely.
  • By offering more flexible working practices family firms access to a wider pool of labour than other firms. This has the added bonus of boosting diversity of work practices.
  • Family firms tend to enjoy more loyalty from staff members who are motivated to build up the family brand name. Loyalty to the firm tends to be more long lasting.
  • Family firms are more likely to invest for the long-term and focus on long-term returns rather than quarterly results.
  • There is evidence that families tend to draw smaller salaries and dividends allowing more profits to be re-invested back in the business.

 

Problems Faced by Family Businesses

 

  • Recruitment from family narrows level of skills.
  • Nepotistic recruitment strategy discourages talented people. Survey by Price Waterhouse Cooper in UK showed that only 22% of family firms have established criteria for choosing family members.
  • Reluctance to bring in outsiders as non-executive directors hamper use of external knowledge.
  • Family firms may lack professionalism and be reluctant to change and embrace new technology.
  • Reluctance to change management styles or strategies and fail to adapt to market change.

 

Problems Could….

 

  • Family conflicts such as marriage separation and infighting might disrupt the business.
  • Reluctance to dilute control may hamper family firm's growth
  • A family firm might suffer from a conflict between financial and non-financial objectives (eg. Lifestyle enhancing)

 

 

Do these disadvantages outweigh the advantages?

 

Let's say research shows that family businesses do at least as well as non-family businesses.  But there is evidence that family businesses perform better: a study in the 1990's conducted by the London Business School showed that over a 20 year period family controlled businesses on the stock exchange outperformed the overall index by nearly 30%.  A survey by Thomson Financial in 2005 showed that family firms outperformed across Europe.  The Manchester Business School Family Business Index of publicly quoted family firms, outperformed the FTSE All Share by 40% over 1995 to 2005.

 

One particular issue that is bothering many families as many    who went into business as the Maltese economy leaped forward during the seventies is that of succession.  Many business owners are ageing and the issue is greater as their sons or daughters moved to other professions or opened their own, different lines of business.

 

Succession

 

Only one third of family owned businesses survive the transition to the second generation.

 

And of these businesses again only one third will survive to the third generation, meaning that the chances your grandchildren will take over your business are about 1 in 10.

 

Reasons:

  • 1. There is no qualified successor
  • 2. Businesses fail or are sold off due to lack of planning.
  • 3. Main reasons are personal and family issues that preclude succession planning.

 

  

  Fear of Retirement

 

For most business owners their business is their single largest asset in terms of value, but it also represents a major source of self-esteem and personal worth.  Many owners simply don't want to think about the day when they will no longer be running the business.  The fear of retirement pushes succession to a question of the owner's death.

 

Our essential issue: how to pick our child to succeed while being fair to others.

 

Success Planning

 

This is an important issue (BDO Dunwoody: Succession Planning For Family Business)

 

Planning process:

  • Determining whether business succession within the family is viable
  • Develop your succession plan
  • Monitor the implementation of the plan and make changes as necessary and coordinate succession plan with personal tax planning for retirement and the distribution of your estate
  • Work to ensure that your succession goals for your business and those of the successor merge and don't just overlook one child simply because his/her goals differ from yours

 

Estate Planning

 

Succession planning leads to another important problem that needs to be resolved: estate planning as you need to ensure that the steps you take do not have a negative effect on your succession plan.

 

Issues Raised by GRTU Founders 60 Years Ago

 

  • 1. Bureaucracy
  • 2. Taxation
  • 3. Unfair competition
  • 4. Corruption
  • 5. Port charges
  • 6. Infrastructure/state of Rds
  • 7. Access to finance
  • 8. Stimulus to growth
  • 9. Price of bread
  • 10. Transport/bases
  • 11. Electricity charges
  • 12. Back payment by Government
  • 13. Late payments

 

  

  

  

  

Central Issues Raised by GRTU Members: What Bothers You Today?

 

Issues:

  • 1. Bureaucracy
  • 2. Red carpet treatment?
  • 3. General accounting principles
  • 4. Simplification
  • 5. Reduced administrative burdens
  • 6. Government is helping so that you can focus on creating wealth
  • 7. Fair taxation system
  • 8. IPSE?
  • 9. Access to finance
  • 10. Risk management
  • 11. Public regulators – MMA, MCA, MRA, OFT, Med. Authority (Labour department/ETC, OHS)
  • 12. EU funding: €38 million
  • 13. Working time
  • 14. Waste management
  • 15. Energy costs
  • 16. Financial crisis
  • 17. Bank charges
  • 18. MIF charges
  • 19. Late Payments
  • 20. Money due for Government
  • 21. Succession/Sell Out
  • 22. Diversification
  • 23. Internationalization

 

Way Ahead

 

  • 1. More professionalism
  • 2. We have to be there
  • 3. Internationalize
  • 4. Training
  • 5. Innovation
  • 6. Restructuring

 

GRTU’s Budget Proposal: Localities

 An important theme for the GRTU is the Locality.  What we refer to by Locality is the Local Council area together with adjacent localities. We are the only national organization that has a strong presence in all of the localities in Malta and Gozo and this is why we the give utmost importance to economic activities in the localities. 

GRTU has excellent relationship with the association of Local Councils and with individual Local Councils. Together we do our utmost to facilitate better traffic management, project building and action that enhances the viability of private services in the Community.  

GRTU notes that Government policies continue to emphasise the zones traditionally associated with enterprise and employment where factories, hotels, Government establishments and the larger private establishment are situated (Harbour area ect…) while very little emphasis is given to promote work and enterprise in the Localities. GRTU believes that given the multiplicity of problems caused by excessive road transport and the over utilization of Localities like Valletta and the whole Harbour area, Government should, as from 2009, launch attractive incentives so that more work and enterprise is generated in the Localities.

GRTU specifically wants to see an extension of tourism to reach also the Localities. GRTU believes that today's economic, environmental and social needs require a strategy of good incentives, that strengthen enterprises in localities and that create more working opportunities by means of, among others, teleworking.  It makes no sense to bring back office work to Malta from New Zealand, Australia and America when we fail to move back office work from Sliema, Valletta, Marsa and Bulebel to other smaller Localities.

We need the Government to create incentives so that work in Localities is strengthened, spending is done in one's own locality and the locality attracts tourist and other activity, which makes the locality more sustainable.  This will strengthened employment and relieve environmental problems and facilitate the employment of women. Women, women with children especially, most times can dedicate only a reduced working day to salary earning work. The closer the job is to the household the lesser time is spent in travel and also the lesser the costs.   

GRTU proposals are as follows:

Reduction of 12% final withholding tax to property development geared towards use as office space or facilities suitable for back office work in the Localities, including call centers. This incentive will create new work opportunities in the Locality while also saving the expense of day centers as women will be able to place children under the care of other family members in the Locality.

Families that accept to house children in the family will be trained and offered attractive financial incentives as childcare within the family has proved to be more rewarding than in standard child care centres.  

Tax credit of up to 50% of expenses to households for improvements that will enable the lodging of tourists where the size of the premises make this possible. The standards will be set by the Malta Tourism Authority and the Malta Standards Authority. This incentive will encourage the extension of tourist residence in the Localities thus providing the necessary impetus for the expansion of city core activities.

Up to 50% tax credit for the renovation and extension of facilities in the city core such as bars, restaurants and cafeterias to create a leisure focal centre. Local Councils will be provided with additional capital funds to provide the necessary facilities in the city centers for the outdoor extension of these enterprises.

The adoption of the same tax regime successfully implemented with families hosting English language students to household owners who offer lodging facilities to tourists.

Additional capital grants to Local Councils to encourage the promotion of private parking facilities to service clients utilizing the new or the extended enterprises in the city core.

Special allocation of funds coupled with adequate fiscal incentives to promote urban renewal and refurbishment in the traditional village and town core.

Tax relief on expenditure affected by property owners in the traditional urban centers used on the renovation and restoration of facades.

Special tax relief and capital grants for the initiation of local taxi/transport services.  

Special financial awards to be given to local councils that support enterprises and economic growth.  Local Authority Business Growth Incentive (LABGI)

Up to 50% tax credit on all initial expenses suffered by businesses that opt to transfer back office work to the Localities. The supportive scheme will also include special electricity and water rates for firms who's back office work functions from the Localities.

Special tax credit should be provided to business establishment that introduce special crime prevention facilities on a joint cooperative basis such as street cameras and monitoring of commercial and city centers as well as for the organization of neighborhood watch. Similar schemes will not only act as crime prevention mechanisms but will reduce the public cost for the provision of crime prevention and policing.

 

 

 

 

GRTU and Capping

 

"Minister Austin Gatt said that on the issue of capping of electricity bills, for the 78 selected large firms, Enemalta is revenue neutral. This really means that all other Enterprise owners, small and medium, are paying a hidden tariff of 10% on their electricity and water bills to cover for Enemalta's deficit. It is neutral to Government but negative to all our members, it is also negative to all families.

 

The is completely unjust. The solution GRTU is proposing is that Government sets up a Special Fund and funding should come from either the privatisation process or from the selling of Government assets. This is the same solution that GRTU had proposed successfully when Levies were removed and many firms needed to be supported to diversify and survive.

GRTU will not accept a capping solution at the expense of enterprise in general. It is hard enough for business owners to meet the current electricity bills incorporating the 95% surcharge and the hidden 10% capping subsidy. This is the last Bill including this hidden subsidy. From the next Bill onwards GRTU will issue Directives to Businesses to pay their Bills less 10%." GRTU President Paul Abela's clear message.

 

Mitigation Plan on the proposed Utility Tariffs

 Immediately after the proposals for the new Utility Tariffs were made public GRTU worked around the clock to make a counter proposal and yesterday during a press conference even published a mitigation plan.

The basic flow in the proposal is the grand figure of €415m that is to be received from these tariffs. This because €104m are already being received by Government from excise duties on fuels. For this and several other reasons the €415m figure is unacceptable and must be reduced. GRTU is therefore pleased to hear that Government if reviewing the proposal seriously.

 

When analysing Government's proposal many questions soared on the financial strategy being adopted, the spread of years on which the tariffs are spread, etc. This shows that serious discussion with the social partners needs to be held.

KPMG adopted the base figure of €100 per barrel, the highest figure it could have taken of course. When GRTU worked out the average cost per barrel over a ten year period the amount did not exceed €60 per barrel! GRTU's Director General, Vincent Farrugia,  therefore explained that a surcharge which goes up and done according to the price of oil would be more desirable. This together with a fixed tariff.

GRTU is concerned as many of our members are not yet realising how much the cost of electricity and water will increase. This because the bill with the 95% surcharge has not reached everyone yet.

Government is alarming people with a crises when this is not the case. Government bought oil to last till March so the urgency of backdating the tariffs from 1st October can be done away with.

GRTU kindly asked the Office of Fair Trading and the Malta Resources Authority to make the necessary investigations. Till now we heard nothing from both, it is high time we did though!

GRTU estimates that the figure should go down to €210m. Anything above €265m is not really justified. It is estimated that the current tariffs loaded with 95% surcharge will bring in €265m, a sum more than enough for Enemalta to meet  its current and medium to long term obligations.

Mitigation Plan

Electricity

  • 1. Return on Capital Employed is not to be included
  • 2. Part of Excise Duty on Payment of Fuel not included.
  • 3. 5% of throughput losses only to be burdened to account holders.
  • 4. Introduction of a quota A allocation benchmarked on Usage in Year 2005. Quota Allocations would allow for different allocation according to class of use.
  • 5. Government to ban any imports of incandescent lighting after 1st January 2009. Government is to continue to work on a system to provide 5 CFL lamps for free and a discounted rate for an additional 5 CFL Lamps.
  • 6. Introduction of Rebates on Installation of Solar Heaters and Photovoltaic Panels with rebates covering minimally 70% of outlayed capital. Rebate to be given 50% through billing structure over 365 days and 50% in payment.
  • 7. All new households as off 1st January 2009, applied for to be built should include Solar Water Heater as mandatory.
  • 8. The introduction of the Energy Efficiency in Buildings Directive in January 2009 should also continue to be implemented together with the setting up of a Stakeholder task force to deal with already built structures prior to end December 2008.
  • 9. The establishment of a threshold for households depending on the individuals in the home. Tariffs are to be structured on the basis so that we primarily opt to conserve energy.
  • 10. Conserving the use of energy is vital in making sure the above is reached and that is why Energy Audits should be a must in households, certified by an Engineer. Energy Audited residences should be given 50% of the cost of the audit in payment terms.
  • 11. Smart Metering for Residential Customers
  • 12. Quick cost benefit analysis indicates that an improved communication between utility and customer meter will result in large energy savings during peak demand
  • 13. Traffic Lights and Public Street Lighting should be converted to solar power with a battery backup. This is another costly but needed project.
  • 14. The hospitality industry should embark on a program to convert all water heating to solar power.
  • 15. Energy Audits in all Government Buildings
  • 16. Develop Common reporting requirements for energy usage in government establishments
  • 17. Define Specific Department Projected Energy Use
  • 18. Develop an Energy Auditing Protocol
  • 19. Shut down electricity supply in Government buildings after hours
  • 20. Restrict times for cleaning services out side office hours.
  • 21. Promote efficient use of heaters and Air Conditioners
  • 22. Install Energy Management Devices on appliances
  • 23. Install Energy Efficient Lighting
  • 24. Install motion detectors and Card Controlling devices in all Government buildings
  • 25. Install Solar Energy Systems/ Photovoltaic In Governments buildings
  • 26. Install Sensor Lighting

Water

  • 1. Distribution costs which have risen alarmingly in the last two years need to be identified so that a verified monetary value is only included in the tariff structure.
  • 2. Rental fees for meter to be removed and included as part of a tariff structure.
  • 3. A standard tariff for a year use payable upfront would be inclusive of a particular discount factor.
  • 4. One tier option for all other users with a billing structure that has a discount for early billing through electronic sources only.
  • 5. Any increases are to be based on a bench mark for use by all households and commerce based on 2005 basis usage figures.
  • 6. Hotels to further conserve energy by placing sub metering in each rented room and placing a bench mark to that room, thus making customer pay of excess water beyond the allowed bench mark. Conservation of a resource as critical as water needs to be monitored closely by high impact users.
  • 7. WSC is to embark on a water audit Scheme with finances coming from MRA through EU funding, starting off with the 120 capped industries/hotels.
  • 8. Along term rebate plan for industries/hotels utilizing better technologies for both water use and distribution.

GRTU also proposes the setting up of a stakeholder task force and a national awareness campaign. Full Mitigation Plan available on GRTU's website: www.grtu.org.mt.

 

 

 

 

 

Budget 2009 – GRTU Proposal

 

Introduction

GRTU, as a national representative of the self-employed and small businesses in our country, as well as a promoter of a vast number of proposals and suggestions for the strengthening of enterprises, prefers to convey its proposals in the format of a Manifesto on behalf of small enterprises. GRTU's Manifesto is adjourned each year specifically to meet annual Government Budget targets.

GRTU's proposals are prepared in full and continuous consultation with our members and are continually updated in accordance to current issues, Governmental proposals as well as economic and social circumstances that come up from time to time. This is done in the context of Malta's membership in the European Union and within the framework of the EU Acquis Communautaire.

Our proposals are not targeted for implementation in one single year but are meant to be achieved within a framework of 3 to 4 years. The proposals we present here are aimed specifically at the 2009 Budget.

 

Localities

An important theme for the GRTU is the Locality.  What we refer to by Locality is the Local Council area together with adjacent localities. We are the only national organization that has a strong presence in all of the localities in Malta and Gozo and this is why we the give utmost importance to economic activities in the localities.  GRTU has excellent relationship with the association of Local Councils and with individual Local Councils. Together we do our utmost to facilitate better traffic management, project building and action that enhances the viability of private services in the Community.  

GRTU notes that Government policies continue to emphasise the zones traditionally associated with enterprise and employment where factories, hotels, Government establishments and the larger private establishment are situated (Harbour area ect…) while very little emphasis is given to promote work and enterprise in the Localities.  GRTU believes that given the multiplicity of problems caused by excessive road transport and the over utilization of Localities like Valletta and the whole Harbour area, Government should, as from 2009, launch attractive incentives so that more work and enterprise is generated in the Localities.

GRTU specifically wants to see an extension of tourism to reach also the Localities. GRTU believes that today's economic, environmental and social needs require a strategy of good incentives, that strengthen enterprises in localities and that create more working opportunities by means of, among others, teleworking.  It makes no sense to bring back office work to Malta from New Zealand, Australia and America when we fail to move back office work from Sliema, Valletta, Marsa and Bulebel to other smaller Localities.

We need the Government to create incentives so that work in Localities is strengthened, spending is done in one's own locality and the locality attracts tourist and other activity, which makes the locality more sustainable.  This will strengthened employment and relieve environmental problems and facilitate the employment of women. Women, women with children especially, most times can dedicate only a reduced working day to salary earning work. The closer the job is to the household the lesser time is spent in travel and also the lesser the costs.   

GRTU proposals are as follows:

 

  • 1. Reduction of 12% final withholding tax to property development geared towards use as office space or facilities suitable for back office work in the Localities, including call centers. This incentive will create new work opportunities in the Locality while also saving the expense of day centers as women will be able to place children under the care of other family members in the Locality.
  • 2. Families that accept to house children in the family will be trained and offered attractive financial incentives as childcare within the family has proved to be more rewarding than in standard child care centres.
  • 3. Tax credit of up to 50% of expenses to households for improvements that will enable the lodging of tourists where the size of the premises make this possible. The standards will be set by the Malta Tourism Authority and the Malta Standards Authority. This incentive will encourage the extension of tourist residence in the Localities thus providing the necessary impetus for the expansion of city core activities.
  • 4. Up to 50% tax credit for the renovation and extension of facilities in the city core such as bars, restaurants and cafeterias to create a leisure focal centre. Local Councils will be provided with additional capital funds to provide the necessary facilities in the city centers for the outdoor extension of these enterprises.
  • 5. The adoption of the same tax regime successfully implemented with families hosting English language students to household owners who offer lodging facilities to tourists.
  • 6. Additional capital grants to Local Councils to encourage the promotion of private parking facilities to service clients utilizing the new or the extended enterprises in the city core.
  • 7. Special allocation of funds coupled with adequate fiscal incentives to promote urban renewal and refurbishment in the traditional village and town core.
  • 8. Tax relief on expenditure affected by property owners in the traditional urban centers used on the renovation and restoration of facades.
  • 9. Special tax relief and capital grants for the initiation of local taxi/transport services.
  • 10. Special financial awards to be given to local councils that support enterprises and economic growth. Local Authority Business Growth Incentive (LABGI)
  • 11. Up to 50% tax credit on all initial expenses suffered by businesses that opt to transfer back office work to the Localities. The supportive scheme will also include special electricity and water rates for firms who's back office work functions from the Localities.
  • 12. Special tax credit should be provided to business establishment that introduce special crime prevention facilities on a joint cooperative basis such as street cameras and monitoring of commercial and city centers as well as for the organization of neighbourhood watch. Similar schemes will not only act as crime prevention mechanisms but will reduce the public cost for the provision of crime prevention and policing.

 

Better Regulation

Investment and growth of the economy is a very important theme for the GRTU.  GRTU insists that the business owner should be kept satisfied which in turn aids growth, investment and employment.  Unfortunately, after many years of talk, when weighing the burdens of form filling and time wasted on bureaucratic matters, we still find that owners spend more time doing this rather than focusing on their businesses and how to make them better.

Proposals:

 

  • 1. Corporations and departments falling under separate budgetary votes will suffer an annual penalty should they fail to markedly reduce administrative burdens. Similarly additional bonuses will be paid to corporations and accountancy units, within the whole public sector, where measurable reductions of bureaucratic burdens are registered.
  • 2. Funds available to departments and corporations for economic impact assessments should be clearly earmarked and departmental heads must, on a 6 monthly basis, publish reports on how these funds have been spent and publicise copies of the resulting impact assessment analysis report.
  • 3. The Malta Accounting and Reporting Standard for Smaller Entities (MARSSE) is not simple enough Government had promised to do away with the legal necessity for annual audits of small firms and GRTU continues to insist that this promise should be implemented. Small businesses should be given the option to produce a simple financial statement that tallies with the regular VAT returns. GRTU believes that the returns submitted to the income tax department and the VAT department are sufficient to enable a proper audit trail and all excessive returns should be eliminated.
  • 4. Government will, whether for NSO or other, be prohibited from seeking information from businesses when this information is already available in the annual returns for Income Tax and VAT. Enterprise owners will be requested to authorise the use of these returns in spite of the choices they have under the data protection act.
  • 5. The principal secretary will publish a quarterly report on all consultation conducted and also publish all mitigation plans resulting from such consultations for every new public service initiative that will infringe on enterprises.
  • 6. Government will ensure that all fines resulting from fiscal or administrative contravention will be of a civil and not of a criminal fine, recoverable only through civil juridical action.
  • 7. Government should conduct an exercise to ensure that all environmental and planning regulations imposing administrative burdens are rationalised and simplified.
  • 8. The multitude of inspectorates and enforcement officers emerging from different legal positions should be unified into one focal inspectorate and enforcement regime. It is no longer feasible, and it is an absolute abuse of free enterprise, to have a multitude of inspectorates and enforcement agencies visiting enterprises and premises with complete disregard to the integrity and rights of individual business owners.
  • 9. GRTU is in favour of the empowerment of this unified inspectorate and enforcement agency to act in a professional manner to eradicate all forms of illicit trading and unfair competition resulting from law evasion. GRTU recognises that the licit and professional enterprise owner is under constant and increasing treat as the level of illicit trading, law evasion and standards abuse continues to grow unhindered.

Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA)

GRTU recommends that MFSA drastically reviews its forms and penalty structures for enterprises that do not meet the stringent deadlines imposed by MFSA. GRTU also recommends that all pending fines become applicable on the new agreed rates.

 

Investment in Education

Government's programme of investment in new colleges is attractive and needs to be speeded up. GRTU has been recommending since 2005 that Government should have a strategy for all the buildings falling under the Ministry of Education. Some of these buildings have now outlived their purpose as schools of education centers, occupying prime cites in most Localities. Government should devise a specific policy for the reuse of these sites both for social and commercial purposes. Government can generate new funds from the privatization of selected sites and the revenue can be utilized to speed up the building of new collages.

Many of the older buildings cannot be refitted for the standards and class room sizes and facilities of new educational establishments and most of the old sites are bad examples of efficient use of a scarce and costly resource like land in the town and city cores.

 

Supporting Families

Government spends €2,600 per student in state aided education. Parents who send their children to fee paying private schools are given only a maximum of €700 per child. GRTU recommends that families in fee paying schools receive the full educational charge of €2,600 as taxable deductions.

 

Pensions

Government should now move on to the second stage of the pension reform and hold discussions with GRTU and other private sector organizations to ensure that the self employed and workers employed by the private sector can contribute to the second pillar taxation schemes, in addition to the basic pension scheme under the national pension service.

Government must be willing to provide all the necessary tax relief to encourage the growth of new stakeholder's pension schemes.

 

Construction and Property Investment

The current situation in the property market requires specific action by Government to ensure that the available properties on the market reach property buyers at affordable prices and ensure that there is no collapse of this sector. The Maltese are more than 80% property owners and when the value of property falls drastically, effectively families suffer a devaluation of their main asset. In the case of younger families buying on mortgage, this prices create additional problems as payments due on property purchased when the prices where high may be less than prices currently available for the purchase of similar properties. Government should at all costs avoid a heavy dislocation of the market as the pain will be suffered by many and not just by the developers.

The property developing and construction industry is in Malta a major employer, directly and through many services auxiliary to the property market. Action is needed to ensure that this employment and income generation is not threatened. The situation today is already very serious and GRTU wants Government intervention as of 2009.

Current Situation Affecting the Development Industry

The GRTU, through surveys amongst its members, notes that the current situation in the development industry exhibits areas of concern in spite of a healthy employment scenario and a buoyant, still fragile tourism industry. This scenario begs a concerted effort by all the stakeholders involved. GRTU notes that the issues involved, although widespread, can be split into 3 main categories:

  1. Oversupply in the residential component targeted for first time buyers
  2. Stringent banking conditions
  3. Indecision by prospective buyers although market correction is taking place

The Oversupply Issue

The current oversupply resulted from different factors:

 

  • Height relaxation and rezoning into higher densities by MEPA
  • Repatriation of money
  • Low interest rates
  • Entry into the property market by inexperienced developers (mainly attributed to forced bartering practice)

 

 

 

Stringent Banking Conditions

GRTU notes that the loaning situation vis-à-vis the local banks has drastically changed from a relaxed approach into a very cautious one contributing to a lower affordability across the board, also driven by high interest rates.  This reflects the global turmoil in financial sectors.

GRTU recommends that Government issues the necessary safeguards to the commercial banks on home loans schemes to ensure that no action is taken by the Bank that will create a situation where people are forced to place their properties on the market, irrespective of the lower redeeming prices.

Government should also seek to establish with the banks means of safeguarding property investors who may face difficulties resulting from the reduced activity in the property market forcing property owners to dump property on the market as a result of pressure from the banks and an extremely bad economic message that in a small inter-related economy like Malta should be avoided.

Indecision by Prospective Buyers

GRTU notes that the downward market situation is sending out wrong signals to prospective buyers. Many prospective buyers are postponing their buying decision expecting Government to act or the market to settle this is a normal when the prices are falling and budget 2009 is the appropriate time for Government to halt a potential negative spiral.

Recommendations to Avoid Hard Landing

 

  • 1. Given the available housing stock Government should grab the opportunity to redirect public money (approximately Lm9 million) envisaged for the construction of 300 odd social housing units to more appropriately targeted incentives.

The provision of social housing constructed by Government or by the housing authority should not be understood as some form of dogma. Government intervention in this field is necessary when there is a shortage of supply of housing units. The situation in Malta today is that of an abundance of empty residential units. Some of these are in the older towns and village cores. An intelligent programme of urban renewal would encourage developers to invest more in this type of construction work rather than the building of new units in newer areas or the demolition of existing business. GRTU proposes that developers are given reduced tax rates as a form of encouragement to invest in urban renewal. Developers and purchasers will similarly be fiscally assisted so that refurbished city core buildings become more affordable whether on purchase, rent or emphyteutical lease.

GRTU feels that enough buildings for social housing have been constructed and that currently there are good prices on the market for new apartments and their availability will continue for the next 3-5 years. It is not the right time to devote more public land for the construction of buildings for social housing since abundant supply for is already available.  In certain cases the prices given by the Housing Authority are even higher than those given by the private sector.

GRTU proposes that rather than spending money on new construction, thus further reducing the land available for building and furthering the already excessive supply of property available on the market for housing purposes, Government should utilise moneys available to provide schemes that encourage people to rent, buy or lease on emphyteutical basis, and partly lease property which is available on the market.

This option would also give a greater choice to people seeking affordable housing and, since the available units are spread throughout the islands, people will be better served without time delays. Government should direct its resources for the creation of work to sustain building contractors and the self employed to the areas that offer greater economic potential such as port projects, the building of factories and the provision of back office facilities in the localities.

 

  • 2. Allocate funds for the introduction of the pre-electoral promise re: shared ownership scheme.

 

There are sufficient housing units available on the market that can be sold for less than €100,000 provided Government incentivises buyers. GRTU proposes the granting of up to €25,000 to first time buyers who are willing to purchase properties of up to €150,000. Government will still have a positive return on a scheme like this as the total taxation due to Government on properties of this value surpasses the grant figure. GRTU proposes a scheme for first homebuyers that will make available up to 750 units in one year, or a lesser figure depending on the availability of funds.

It is important to note that Government will effectively not loose anything as currently the market is not reporting particular changes, implying that the full tax potential of Government cannot be forthcoming, so that a reduced tax return will still signify additional revenue.

 

  • 3. Incentivise the rental and emphyteutical concessions by introducing a flat tax rate to owners.

 

GRTU has been emphasizing the importance of this concession for a long time as it is the way forward for movement in the rental market.  There is a fear in government that there will be a precendent of revenue from Income Tax, if the scheme proposed by GRTU will be introduced. Government must separate revenue on investment from revenue on income or trading. Revenue from property is revenue from investment and not trading.

The argument is misconstrued as the issue is one of revenue on investment and not revenue on income or trading. What GRTU is proposing is a reduced rate of taxation on investment income due on investment in property and not a reduction of taxation due from income derived from the trading of property. Income tax from rents remains very low so reduced preferential rate on rental income will not only encourage more renting but will also make this form of income more easily declarable for income tax purposes. GRTU also proposes that those seeking new housing units who prefer to rent, rather than buy, should also enjoy a tax relief on their rent payments.

GRTU further recommends that potential buyers will be given a market option of co ownership where the property owner will continue to hold part of the property under emphyteutical lease agreements. Buyers will have the option to redeem the emphyteutical lease at a later stage. Land owners should be encouraged to offer these emphyteutical leases

 

  • 4. Incentivise the rental and emphyteutical concessions by introducing tax credits to first time buyers for a given number of years.

GRTU proposes a 5% final withholding tax on rented properties that are taken up by persons who are either first time on the market or normally qualified social housing. Persons renting are given a 50% tax allowance on the value of the rents and rents payable by families that qualify for social housing will be subsidised up to the level of social housing rents on equivalent social housing properties.

 

  • 5. Extend the 5 year option granted on final withholding tax to 8 years. This is intended to save substantial numbers of developers from a serious credit crunch.

Before entering the EU there was a boom in property prices which affected prices in land. The market situation has now changed and GRTU is therefore recommending that the 12% final withholding tax should now be reduced to 10% while for those who are paying 25% on the project revenue GRTU recommends an extension of the allowable period form 5 years to 8 years. These proposals reflect the current deflationary situation in the market and would avoid a credit crunch for a number of developers who acquired land at a very high price.

It is important here to note that the current 12% tax rate and the limited 5 year period are having a negative effect on the sale of property to foreigners. It is extremely important that this market is revitalised not only because foreign direct investment in the property market has clear, absolute, positive, economic advantage but also as a relief for the current abnormal stock situation in the property market with the resultant negative impact on bank finance and general economic activity in the sector.

 

  • 6. Elimination of double taxation in connection with final withholding tax on VAT payments.

 

Developers pay VAT on furnishings and improvements in addition to another 12% on them when selling. This double taxation is unfair and should be removed, in accordance with European Law. This amendment will also go a long way to ensure a better audit trail in this sector and thus avoid VAT and Income Tax evasion. The overall tax returns to Government should improve and not diminish as a result of this amendment.

 

  • 7. Final withholding or capital gains should be paid on the real selling price ad not subject to Government's architects' valuation.

GRTU notes that architects representing the CIR are on many occasions inflating property values and causing buyers to suffer unnecessary fines. There are many circumstances where the vendor is forced to place the property on the market at heavily reduced prices, as a result of either bank pressure and adverse economic situations affecting the business or the sector in which he/she operates. It is not fair that the parties to such property deals are castigated as the CIR property evaluators disregard such situations.

GRTU is recommending that, unless specific and clearly identified indications lead to a contrary judgement, the taxable values should be those as in the deed of sales. CIR should conduct random investigations and in cases where clear evidence of fraud is established judgement will be held in the appropriate tribunal. 

 

  • 8. Set up task force made up of the relevant stakeholders to examine practical ways of addressing excess supply of housing units through the introduction of mixed use zoning given the current demand for commercial/office uses.

There is an increasing demand for property that can be used for back office work or other commercial activity that does not disturb areas that are normally residential. GRTU recommends that MEPA releases the current stringent conditions for the use of properties in residential areas for office and other low key economic activity in order to further sustain economic activities in the Localities. We also suggest the release of more available property to meet the increasing demands for properties for economic rather than residential use.

 

  • 9. Tap the buoyant tourism market to promote the investment of foreign money in targeted areas of housing surplus.

GRTU strongly believes that more properties in the localities should be made available for foreign buyers as foreign residents in the localities provide economic activities in the localities and make commercial activities in the localities more viable

GRTU also recommends that Government should provide fiscal incentives to owners with large homes and empty properties to convert these places for tourist accommodation purposes. The scheme successfully negotiated by GRTU – the favourable income tax assessment scheme- on behalf of families hosting students seeking to learn English, should be extended to households and property owners to convey properties wholly or in part for tourism accommodation purposes.

 

  • 10. In view of the Energy Directive, the Government should set up a fund to aid stakeholders in its implementation.

GRTU furthermore recommends that expenditure effected by developers and property owners in investment that fulfil obligations under the Energy Directive in respect of energy saving and use of alternative energy, including also the cost of energy audits on properties, be subsidised through a combination of grants or tax credits (where taxation is due from owners) of up to 70% of actual costs. The subsidy is paid over a pried of 3 years in the form of 50% tax credit or subsidy and the other 50% on the form of reduced electricity tariffs. 

 

  • 11. To tackle indecision by prospective buyers, GRTU strongly recommends a 6 month moratorium on the payment of stamp duty on property purchased by first time buyers.

GRTU recommends that Government gives a 6 month concession period to first-time buyers including foreigners so that they are exempt from stamp duty on prices up to €150,000.  This would effectively kick start the economy in property transactions, tempting buyers get out from the waiting game thus removing fear and uncertainty.

 

Rent Reform

It is worth mentioning the serious mistake that was done in this subject in the proposals of the White Paper for the Reform in Commercial Rent Laws.  GRTU has already presented its proposal, based on facts, case studies and consultation with members.  Unfortunately, this cannot be said for the way the White Paper was drawn up.  This White Paper is a big disappointment for GRTU especially at a time when the European Union is implementing the Small Business Act aimed primarily at issues safeguarding the interests of small enterprises in relation to other economic factors that hamper their growth and development, which gives major importance to enterprises and the emphasis of each Directive is built on the "think small first principle".

The 1995 reform gave Malta the most liberal rent law in the whole of the EU. Today however, while other Member States fought first and foremost to safeguard the interests of enterprise owners, thus recognising that security of tenure is important for the encouragement of entrepreneurship and the generation of productive work, the Maltese Government accepted that the rights of property owners are superior to those of investors in enterprise whether commercial, craft, services or manufacturing.

GRTU has studied the rent laws for commercial establishments in other countries, including that of the country presently holding the EU presidency, France.  The rent law in France is a good one and of advantage to all the parties concerned.  While France's Act provides just protection for all those who rent, it also provides specific protection for those who rent.  For this reason, we appeal for the study of France's law because many of its essential measures are missing from the White Paper.

GRTU believes that the approach adopted by the French Government and by other G

GRTU updated position: Eurovignette Directive

 General remarks

GRTU is critical of the European Commission's proposal on the revision of the Eurovignette Directive 1999/62/EC.

The Commission was asked in 2006 to propose a strategy for stepwise implementation of the model for all transport modes, accompanied if appropriate by a proposal for revising the Eurovignette Directive.

The impact assessment analysis carried out shows a negative impact on growth in the EU from internalisation, but it does not consider whether the same environmental benefits could be achieved in a different, perhaps better way through other political measures.

 

Furthermore, the impact analysis shows that all modes of transport should be covered by internalisation while the proposal only applies to road freight transport.

The proposal introduces new ways of charging lorries, however, GRTU questions if increasing the cost of road freight transport will lead to the aimed result. The main disadvantage will be more expensive transport without having taken into account the effects on employment, regional development, differences in location, etc. The adjustment costs can be substantial for the economy, particularly when no alternatives are available.

Increasing the cost of road transport will not make transport greener in Europe unless alternative modes or fuels are available.

Specific remarks

Methodology and calculation

The analysis also shows the immense difficulties of collecting and applying correct and precise data. This means that determining the existing degree of internalisation is difficult, but also establishing the correct level of charges to achieve an improved sustainability at local and national level is extremely difficult, if not impossible. Furthermore a charge for noise should be based on the noise effect from the specific vehicle.

Levels charged

It is important that any EU rules puts a limit on how much Member States can charge. It is also important that full transparency exists and the calculations, methods and values applied by Member States are checked by the Commission. A procedure for complaints about the levels of charges must be established.

Congestion charging

The proposal suggests introduction of a congestion charge, but only for heavy good vehicles (HGVs). There is a provision that will allow for extended application of congestion charge  

from 2012, but Member States will still be able not to apply the charge if they are concerned about the effect.

Congestion is caused by all vehicles using the road. A congestion charge only on part of the vehicles will not contribute significantly to a reduced congestion.

Other externalities

For the proposal to have an effect, any further charging must be linked to the existing taxes and charges to determine the overall level of internalisation. To want to introduce CO2 in this proposal, will require that the fuel duties already being paid are taken into consideration. Calculations show, that on that basis road transport already pays more for a ton of CO2 than the existing market price for emission of a ton of CO2.

Earmarking

The revenues from any charges for externalities must be used to reduce the externalities. If the externalities disappear the charges must also disappear. The earmarking of the proposal is in this context an integrated part of the policy instrument and cannot be rejected.

The revenues from external costs should go to the mode of transport that has been charged or taxed. As stated in the impact assessment analysis it is a prerequisite for the achievement of sustainable transport that the revenue is used to improve the conditions that cause the charges in the first place. GRTU is against cross-subsidising particularly in a situation, where road infrastructure is already scarce – leading to congestion and even more pollution and noise.

Expected impact

GRTU finds that co-modality is essential in order to solve the problems of many externalities in transport. However, to make the switch to other transport modes or to promote co-modality in the supply chain, there must be alternatives available which are efficient and effective; at present this is often not the case. Furthermore, alternative modes of transport often only prove to be an option for longer distances and in other places of the supply chain. The "last mile" transport, in particular in city centres, clearly remains road transport.

The commerce sector is continuously put under pressure even more so these days with the already increasing food and fuel prices. The result of the proposal will be more expensive transport rather than a reduction of road freight transport or shift to other modes of transport. In a period of increasing energy and food prices the consumers will be the main victim as the commerce sector will have no alternative than to pass on the costs down the supply chain.

As regards tackling environmental nuisances, more emphasis should be put on infrastructure and technological development. Measures aiming at reducing the negative aspects of freight transport by the commerce sector exist already and the sector continues to achieve effective and cost-efficient solutions. Introducing more charges will not result in less traffic. Instead, the Commission should encourage the taking up of, for example, clean and efficient solutions for vehicles, to provide fiscal advantages for the users of cleaner/efficient/less noisy vehicles, and to increase the use of new technologies and innovative solutions for improved traffic flow.

 

Enforcement of State Aid law by national courts

 The European Commission (DG Competition) published a communication on the "Enforcement of State Aid Law by National Courts". To promote the use of national courts, in order to fight illegal aid given to (large) competitors, may be an efficient way to ensure a level playing filed for small enterprises.

In most of the cases legal complains to national courts may be a more efficient way to stop illegal aid than sending complains to the EU Commission, which needs normally much more time to take and to enforce negative State aid decisions.

The guiding principles for a comprehensive reform of state aid rules and procedures over the next five years have been outlined in a State Aid Action Plan just adopted by the European Commission.

 

In particular, the Commission intends to use the EC Treaty's state aid rules to encourage Member States (MS) to contribute to the Lisbon Strategy by focussing aid on improving the competitiveness of EU industry and creating sustainable jobs, on ensuring social and regional cohesion and improving public services.

Competition Commissioner Neelie Kroes commented: "The state aid reforms outlined in the Action Plan aim to ensure MS have a clear, comprehensive and predictable framework, so that they can provide state aid which contributes to cohesion, competitiveness and high quality public services."

The State Aid Action Plan is based on the following elements:

  • Less distortive and better targeted state aid, in line with the European Council's repeated declarations, so that public money is used effectively to the benefit of EU citizens in terms of improving economic efficiency, generating more growth and sustainable jobs, social and regional cohesion, improving services of general economic interest, sustainable development and cultural diversity

a more refined economic approach, so that less distortive aid, particularly where money is less easily available from financial markets, can be approved more easily and quickly and so that the Commission concentrates its resources on the cases liable to create  

  • more serious distortions of competition and trade
  • more streamlined and efficient procedures, better enforcement, higher predictability and enhanced transparency. For example, MS currently have to notify the Commission most of the state subsidies they want to give. The Commission proposes to exempt more measures from this notification obligation and to simplify procedures.
  • a shared responsibility between the Commission and Member States: the Commission cannot improve state aid rules and practice without the effective support of MS and their full commitment to comply with their obligations to notify any envisaged aid and to enforce the rules properly.

This is a positive proposal for GRTU and its members and therefore GRTU urges the national authorities to react positively on this initiative of the European Commission.

 

A look at the current SEPA

 

Last January, the first stage of the Single Euro Payments Area (SEPA) was implemented, with the possibility to conduct credit transfers within the framework of this Area. The developments that we will witness in the coming years should lead to a situation whereby every client should be able to make non-cash euro payments to somebody else in the Eurozone, simply by using one bank account and one payment instrument. In simpler terms, payments to an account holder based in any other part of the SEPA may be effected with the same ease as those in your home State.

 

The process to get there is extensive and lengthy – the various processes and payment instruments currently available must be made to correspond with each other. For example, a debit card related to your normal bank account must be accepted everywhere, which means that all cards and payment terminals currently on the market must conform to the SEPA requirements.

Although this is a European banking industry initiative, the European Central Bank is an important catalyst in the process and is trying to ensure that the system is in the best interests of the clients – as it was  intended. For this purpose, a survey has been prepared for the purpose of determining the extent to which companies are aware of and ready for this development. It must be ensured that the series of products related to SEPA will meet the needs of their users. The consultation period has now come to an end and the results will soon be issued.

Source: Focus @ MEUSAC

 

Malta Chamber of SMEs
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.