The stalled ERDF funds for PVs directed at the private sector


Noel Gauci, GRTU Renewable Energy
Section President, informed members that according to the information we have,
there were many companies involved in the issue, mainly with dubious
quotations. These will suffer a small percentage reduction/recovery of their
grant. Attendees (which comprised of retailers and beneficiaries) unanimously
accepted this reduction/recovery solution, and no one raised any objections.

Those beneficiaries that have more than
just dubious quotes and for which police found evidence of serious wrong doing
shall receive a much larger percentage reduction from the grant. Probably those
found guilty will also be denied access to future funding.

It will be up to the police to decide
who they shall prosecute and up to the beneficiary and retailer to settle who
should bear the reduction. It is understood that involved
suppliers/beneficiaries are to be taken to court by police.

Noel Gauci informed members that GRTU
cannot and will not be getting into such cases as there is the police involved,
and the latter should be allowed to carry their investigations freely even for
the benefit of the sector. Malta Enterprise took GRTU's recommendations to
inform those found completely clean and to allow them to move ahead with their
installations without delay. Our request for an extension of installation
deadline has also been accepted and the new deadline is around mid-December,
beneficiaries shall be informed accordingly. If anyone needs a longer extension
they should contact GRTU.

Noel Gauci warned that inspections will
be carried out by Malta Enterprise to ensure PV systems were according to the
grant agreement, and once again strongly recommended that everything should be
done by the book, according to standards and regulations and good working
practices.

Other matters discussed during the
section meeting:

Net metering: Noel Gauci said he is already raising this
point with MRA and MFEI every now and then, and it is a very important issue
for the high end consumers

Funding for domestic scheme: should be lowered from €3k to
€2.5k

Grid Connection: Members suggested that the current minimum
limit which is 0.5 Kw should be abolished

Skoprew l-islogan “HALLUNA NAHDMU”

Dan kien tal GRTU matul l-ahhar 20 sena u jiraprezenta hafna
proposti li il GRTU ghamlet matul dan iz zmien u li gew inwettqa bi ftehiem bejn GRTU u l-Gvern u li bis sahha taghom is-self employed u sidien ta negozji zghar u medji setghu jahdmu u jikbru u
jgawdu min skemi li bhalhom Malta qatt qabel ma kellha.

Malta’s Independence a great economic, social and political success


GRTU congratulates all true Maltese on Malta's  48th Independence anniversary. 21st
September is Malta's most important day. On 21st September 1964
Malta became Independent for the first time in its history. Malta's destiny
since 21st September 1964 has been determined by the Maltese people
themselves.

Whatever happened after is relevant and important precisely because
on 21st September 1964 Malta became a sovereign state. Malta became
a member of the United Nations. Malta's Independence was an irreversible
status.

The second great achievement for Malta is Malta's accession
to the European Union. Today Malta is politically secure and economically
participant in a single European market, which is the largest single market in
the world beside China and India. For the self-employed and owners of small
business whose livelihood depends pretty much on the successful operation of
the internal Maltese market, Malta's Independence and adhesion to the EU
provides the greatest safeguard for present and future economic well being.
Malta's earning capacity depends on Malta's successful achievements as
effective economic participant in this tremendous single market. Without the
large European single market Malta was permanently locked in an economic
cul-de-sac. Malta's independence gave us the right as a sovereign state to be
part of this tremendous market and to sit at the highest decision making
structures of this largest and most successful union of independent nations.

In a turbulent world where even the
largest economies are finding it difficult to cope, Malta would have definitely
been washed away if it had not belonged to a regional economic union while at
the same time remained a sovereign state. Many Maltese independent private
business owners do not sufficiently appreciate this, but Malta's economy is so
dependent on the rest of the world that it would not have been possible for the
managers of the Maltese economy to make the Island fend for itself during these
last very difficult years when all economic circumstances were adverse. Malta's
participation in the EU and in the European Monitory Union has ensured that
while we could make maximum benefit of our sovereign Independent state we could
simultaneously belong to a Union that provides us with the necessary guarantees
that economic and political security are no longer at a threat. Malta today has
a great and successful story to tell. It is all due to Malta's achievements on
21st September 1964.

GRTU strongly supported Malta's call for Independence. Over
the last 48 years GRTU has steadfastly supported all genuine efforts to make
Malta's independence a great economic, social and political success.

Vince Farrugia’s report adopted as EESC Opinion


Tackling Cross Border Inheritance Tax obstacles – Last Tuesday (18th September) another
report presented by Vincent Farrugia, EESC Employers Representative and GRTU
Director General, as appointed rapporteur was formally adopted as EESC Opinion
with 135 votes in favour, 1 against and 11 abstentions.

The Farrugia report is now the official
EESC Opinion to the Commission Communication on Tackling cross-border
inheritance tax obstacles within the EU and the Commission recommendation
regarding relief for double taxation of inheritances.

EU citizens who inherit assets across
national Member State borders are frequently faced with taxation in two or more
different Member States (i.e. double or multiple taxation) and tax
discrimination. These problems often impose undue hardship on citizens and
hamper the achievement of the EU-2020 objectives. In an attempt to address
these problems, the Commission presented a Communication in 2011 and an
accompanying Recommendation.

In his report Mr Farrugia stated that
the EESC is in favour of removing double/multiple and discriminatory taxation,
and welcomes the approach adopted by the Commission which respects the tax
sovereignty of individual Member States while calling for better interfacing of
national tax systems.

It is however the opinion of the EESC
that the Commission can be more effective in achieving the final aims of this
exercise by:

  • proposing and implementing practical mechanisms which,
    within a reasonable period of time, would ensure the efficient interfacing of
    national tax systems with respect to inheritance taxes, while encouraging
    Member States to institute and operate double/multiple taxation relief
    mechanisms in a more effective and flexible manner;

  • using legislative mechanisms so as to effectively
    eliminate inheritance tax double/multiple taxation of EU citizens;

  • going beyond cross-border taxation issues to look into
    the potentially distortionary effects arising from differences in the
    computation of the inheritance tax base by different national tax
    jurisdictions, by setting common principles applicable across the EU which are
    based on fair net asset valuations and which safeguard the business entity unit
    as a going concern;

  • actively promoting more effective, efficient and
    citizen-friendly taxation systems, involving the least possible burden on
    taxpayers;

  • studying the issues which impinge on EU citizens
    arising out of global cross-border inheritance taxes;

  • studying the possibility of simplifying inheritance
    taxation in cross border situations through a system which imposes taxation
    once at a sole point of taxation determined by the location of the asset.

 

 

 

 

 The EU Taxation Observatory, whose
creation under the auspices of the Commission has been suggested in EESC
opinions  dealing with multiple and
discriminatory taxation, could serve as the instrument through which the above
recommendations are implemented.

This is the fifth successful Farrugia
report being adopted as EESC Opinion.

Meeting to decide on Malta Enterprise Agreement on PV ERDF

ATTN:  Operators in the Renewable Sector &
Beneficiaries of the ERDF Fund related to photovoltaic installations

A
meeting shall be on Monday 17th September – 13.00hrs at GRTU

Registration
is obligatory and can be done by email on or by calling 21232881

Members
are urged to attend this meeting. Non-members are also invited to attend
subject they either join GRTU or pay a €25 fee to attend the meeting.

Commission to unveil cloud computing strategy


In September, Neelie Kroes, the European commissioner for the
digital agenda, will publish her long-awaited strategy for cloud computing,
amid fears that Europe could already be falling behind as technology takes
another leap forward. Internet firms have been hailing cloud computing as
the next big thing for several years, promoting its cost-saving benefits for
customers as they try to win a share of the emerging business.

The stakes are high. Cloud computing could
revolutionise the way businesses work and could expand significantly the extent
to which the internet shapes people's lives. Cloud computing means that data –
such as email, text files, music and photographs – is not stored on a personal
computer or server owned by the individual or organisation, but is instead sent
to the ‘cloud' – or, more precisely, huge data centres owned by different
companies around the world.

The benefits are huge, both in terms of cost and
convenience. Firms – especially SMEs – would save money because they would be
outsourcing IT maintenance, and because the amount of ‘cloud space' they could
buy would be flexible; they could increase or cut the capacity of their data
storage as they needed it.

Convenience could be an even stronger attraction. No
longer will people have to be at the computer where a file is stored. They will
be able to gain access to data from anywhere there is an internet connection.
Files such as medical records and professional qualification certificates will
be available anywhere internationally, which could give new impetus to the EU's
single market. Cloud computing also challenges copyright legislation: listening
to music and watching films stored in the ‘cloud' at the touch of a button is
already commonplace.

However, the European Commission knows that it has to
proceed with caution. It wants to promote cloud computing because it realizes
the economic benefits, but it also realizes that the development raises important
questions about data protection and security. The prospect of huge amounts of
sensitive data being transferred to centres across the world could encounter
resistance. Winning public trust may be the biggest hurdle to overcome.

Crucial steps

Commissioner Kroes is aware that, faced with these
significant technological changes, the Commission needs to have a plan. She
told the European Internet Foundation in March that policymakers have to come
up with a coherent strategy for cloud computing to ensure that this crucial
step in internet use "happens not to Europe, but with Europe".

A swathe of new legislation should not be expected,
however. Kroes is a liberal by nature, and she has already warned of the
dangers of over-regulation in this area. She is likely to take heed of industry
warnings that too many obstacles placed in the way would threaten the EU's
ability to take advantage of these technological advances.

The strategy is not expected to propose any specific
legislation at this stage, but rather set out a plan of action for a legal
framework that promotes cloud-computing development. This includes the measures
needed to complement the data protection regulation proposed by the Commission
in January, and calls for the EU to explore agreements with countries such as
Japan and the United States over the treatment of data.

The strategy will also set out the action needed to
ensure inter-operability and standardisation of cloud services – to ensure that
users are able to choose to move their data away from one cloud service to
another without being locked in' to one company.

The headache for regulators is that data stored ‘in the
cloud' is often spread out across more than one data centre, often in different
countries. The Commission wants users to have the same level of protection no
matter where the data is kept. It will seek to develop ‘model contracts' for
cloud providers to give more legal certainty to users over how their data is
used. This is aimed at giving some assurance that, no matter where the data is
held, it will have the same level of protection as where the user is based –
and that cloud companies will be made accountable if there is a problem.

The risks were set out earlier this month when Europe's
national data protection supervisory authorities issued a report on the issue
of cloud computing. The ‘Article 29 Working Party', made up of the national
authorities, the Commission and Peter Hustinx, the EU's data protection
supervisor, acknowledged that "the rise of cloud computing services can trigger
a number of risks, such as the lack of control over personal data and
insufficient information regarding how, where and by whom data is being
processed".

In the report, published on 1 July, the group said: "By
submitting personal data to the systems managed by the cloud provider, cloud
clients may no longer be in exclusive control of this data."

There is a long way to go. Many details set out in the
cloud-computing strategy will raise questions about cross-border data security.
However, there is a growing belief that the cloud-computing tide cannot be held
back, and, as Kroes said, Europe has to move with it rather than be pushed
along by it.

EP adopts the Energy Efficiency Directive in 1st reading


At the plenary session of this week, the European Parliament
adopted in first reading the Energy Efficiency Directive with 632 votes in
favour, 25 against and 19 abstentions.

You can view the latest version of the directive in
the following link:

The next steps:

  • The directive will enter into force 20 days after its publication in
    EU's Official Journal and member states will have 18 months to transpose it
    into their national laws, by Spring 2014.

  • In April 2013,
    member states are due to present their national efficiency programmes. The
    European Commission will then evaluate them.

  • If the
    Commission considers that the national energy saving plans are not enough to
    meet the 20% energy savings target, it will add to the directive more binding
    measures to reach the 20% target.

  • The energy
    savings achieved will be calculated as of 2014.

  • A review of the
    Directive will take place in 2016.

 

 

The challenges ahead lie now in the implementation of the
legislative text as the Directive leaves a lot of room for manoeuvre to the
Member States. The Commission will try to tighten the text of the Directive
through guidance notes in order to provide some clarity to the text's
ambiguities. UEAPME will provide its input to DG Energy as of this Autumn. 

www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-265&language=EN

Online Consultation: Draft Guide on Human Rights for SMEs


The online
consultation on the draft guide for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)
on human rights (PDF) is now open. This draft guide has been produced in the
course of a European project "Capacity building for SMEs in the field of human
rights", financed by the European Commission. It is one of the priority actions
of the European Commission's strategy on corporate social responsibility for
2011-2014.

The aim of this guide is to
provide practical advice to SMEs on how to meet the expectations of the UN
Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.

The Commission would welcome
any comments on this draft guide by 25 September. In particular, comments are
invited for the following questions:

  • Is the guide
    consistent with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights? If not,
    how should it be made more consistent?

  • Is the guide practically useful for
    SMEs? Do you have any suggestions for how to make it more practically useful?

 

 

 The draft guide
is accessible through:www.global-csr.com/fileadmin/Our_Approach/120823_Full_Guide_SMEs_Draft.pdf

Green MT signs agreement with Birgu Local Council


Holds
activity within the Locality – Last week Green MT formally signed an agreement with Birgu
Local Council in respect to recovery of recyclables from the locality. The
event included the launch of Green MT single sang by Kristina Casolani and
accompanied by a group of youths. During the event Green MT presented rewards
to the youngsters who won a bin design competition. To close off the evening,
Kristina Casolani entertained those present to an acoustic performance together
with guitarist Dean.

Malta Chamber of SMEs
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.